From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable tree (directory) history display Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:01:41 -0700 Message-ID: <7v3bdmf2p6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vy7vef52m.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060701024309.63001.qmail@web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 01 05:01:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FwVjx-0002gy-AR for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jul 2006 05:01:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751622AbWGADBq (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:01:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751545AbWGADBq (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:01:46 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net ([68.230.241.31]:50926 "EHLO fed1rmmtao08.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751285AbWGADBp (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:01:45 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060701030144.JBNM27967.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:01:44 -0400 To: ltuikov@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <20060701024309.63001.qmail@web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Luben Tuikov's message of "Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:43:09 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Luben Tuikov writes: > I took a comparative look with and without "--full-history", > and FWIW, enabling full history just clobbers the output with a lot > of unnecessary information. I.e. it shows merges which do not have > direct consequence or change to the files in the path spec specified > after the "--". >... > FWIW, I think that the original intention (had there been a choice) > would've been to show only most relevant history, i.e. changes > directly related to paths and files after the "--". Sounds sane. Maybe we should clearly explain this behaviour change in the commit log and claim it as an improvement. We might even want to do --no-merges if we go that route.