From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Figured out how to get Mozilla into git Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:55:01 -0700 Message-ID: <7v3bedll62.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <9e4733910606081917l11354e49q25f0c4aea40618ea@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90606082006t5c6a5623q4b9cf7b036dad1e5@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90606091814n1922bf25l94d913238b260296@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910606091848r5fb4d565taabfc5198140daf2@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90606092041neadcc54n2acb6272d1f71de7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 10 05:55:10 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FouZ2-0000hF-36 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 05:55:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030237AbWFJDzE (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 23:55:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030256AbWFJDzE (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 23:55:04 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:36534 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030237AbWFJDzD (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 23:55:03 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060610035502.NSZN6235.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 23:55:02 -0400 To: "Martin Langhoff" In-Reply-To: <46a038f90606092041neadcc54n2acb6272d1f71de7@mail.gmail.com> (Martin Langhoff's message of "Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:41:39 +1200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Martin Langhoff" writes: > Yes, most people have -z3, and I agree with you, on paper it sounds > like the cost is 1/4 of a git clone. > > However. > > The CVS protocol is very chatty because the client _acts_ extremely > stupid. It says, ok, I got here an empty directory, and the server > walks the client through every little step. And all that chatter is > uncompressed cleartext under pserver. > > So the per-file and per-directory overhead are significant. I can do a > cvs checkout via pserver:localhost but I don't know off-the-cuff how > to measure the traffic. Hints? If you have an otherwise unused interface, you can look at ifconfig output and see RX/TX bytes? But that sounds very crude. Running it through a proxy perhaps?