From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] submodule: fix handling of supermodules with relative origin URLs Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 22:16:44 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4nrbbfer.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1337402403-7546-1-git-send-email-jon.seymour@gmail.com> <1337402403-7546-2-git-send-email-jon.seymour@gmail.com> <4FB7ECCF.9020403@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jens Lehmann , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Seymour X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 20 07:16:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SVyVg-0005Wr-3W for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2012 07:16:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750853Ab2ETFQr (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 May 2012 01:16:47 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:49198 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750795Ab2ETFQq (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 May 2012 01:16:46 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701B56191; Sun, 20 May 2012 01:16:46 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=TFBRLBWgvkocNXmzLCgG4/cADRI=; b=sgs5l3 d6a6edTqMawDxOwPQ64FSnCyk6K/L3FO9G8W3/QjBEA58ksf8iNzzhRXQ1KPGg9I qyHr5iJyJEZSQOsfvuiewUOEUUZyX7XPHR2dJZcCy3ImN8QpKo2uZzWFTUwH+gzx 8qU5Vj1sN0rKBHS4kOIareGLcOQXvtwsBkq2w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=BeMyuCzfDXISSc4Al/LGomDC51fUuWLS Q52Bk3kW+CYxI7gI48TanouY+rS0fCrKafwXDv8/Ua9rqjEwmDhhwpjSnlrGK3XI YRKkglx1dBHQgwVTUq0/nwM7llMDTYh9MbbOodRK8FZbOmUjbtxQsGem1gu3ZsaL 7W3eCLrK5T8= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666836190; Sun, 20 May 2012 01:16:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8F4A618F; Sun, 20 May 2012 01:16:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jon Seymour's message of "Sun, 20 May 2012 08:51:08 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FE795D1A-A23A-11E1-9396-FC762E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jon Seymour writes: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Jens Lehmann wrote: >> Am 19.05.2012 06:40, schrieb Jon Seymour: >> >> Just a small nit: I'd prefer to replace the 4 occurrences of the term >> "supermodule" with "superproject". > > Sure. I can't argue with precedent, of course, but I guess I was > favouring the consistency in the suffixes used with sub and super. We fairly consistently say (even outside the documentation---for example, listen to the TechTalk Linus gave in May 2007) "superproject" and never "supermodule". You can tell people who were not paying attention when they say "supermodule" ;-).