From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: "git reset --hard" == "git checkout HEAD" == "git reset --hard HEAD" ??? Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:36:19 -0800 Message-ID: <7v4p0hcp3w.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20090102195724.GA23119@seberino.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: chris@seberino.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 02 23:37:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LIseM-0002Em-AT for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:37:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758580AbZABWg2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:36:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932530AbZABWg1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:36:27 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:34942 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758580AbZABWg0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:36:26 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAF98D8DB; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:36:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEE838D8D9; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:36:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20090102195724.GA23119@seberino.org> (chris@seberino.org's message of "Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:57:24 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C95A9BF6-D91D-11DD-97D0-5720C92D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: chris@seberino.org writes: > Does "git reset --hard" == "git checkout HEAD" == "git reset --hard HEAD" ??? No, but "reset --hard" without a commit-ish defaults to HEAD so the first one and the last one are equivalent. > It seems we have 2 ways to blow away work we haven't checked in yet then right? Wrong.