From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Contributors, please check your names Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:25:41 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4p6oiika.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v8ww0j4ye.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 17 18:26:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KJWJd-0002jb-PZ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:26:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754498AbYGQQZv (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:25:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753043AbYGQQZv (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:25:51 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:41231 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753412AbYGQQZu (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:25:50 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B008E301AA; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:25:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F54A301A7; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:25:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jakub Narebski's message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:49:48 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 034C6DC0-541D-11DD-9850-3113EBD4C077-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: > What about if some authors use different _email_ address, instead? > Is there any way for shortlog to consider them the same? Read the first part of the message you are responding to again please.