From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] use natural ordering to display list of branches. Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:11:13 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4p86rwfi.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <484969F0.1030704@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Cedric Vivier , Brandon Casey , Paolo Bonzini , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 07 01:12:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K4l6b-0007Ir-5Z for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:12:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756985AbYFFXLZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:11:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756951AbYFFXLY (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:11:24 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:63023 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756701AbYFFXLX (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:11:23 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8E73A27; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:11:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B81883A26; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:11:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 7 Jun 2008 00:06:30 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E111B87E-341D-11DD-96CC-F9737025C2AA-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Cedric Vivier wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Brandon Casey wrote: >> > But can't that be just as easily done by piping through sort? (I >> > understand there is a platform which lacks the sort utility, boohoo) >> >> Yes, but sort does not have a natural sort option afaik. > > sort -n That's Numeric sort, isn't it? I sometimes dreamed of having "sort --random" for testing purposes ;-)