From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] http-push: push : deletes remote branch Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:35:19 -0800 Message-ID: <7v4pc4iq94.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080218130726.GA26854@localhost> <20080218155546.GA8934@localhost> <20080219125840.GA14049@localhost> <20080219132410.GA6553@glandium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mike Hommey , Clemens Buchacher , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 19 22:36:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JRa8J-0005lB-Ix for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:36:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754541AbYBSVff (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:35:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754488AbYBSVff (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:35:35 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:65146 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753929AbYBSVfe (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:35:34 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19D57D05; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:35:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87D67D01; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:35:25 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > I think this would not be too much of a hassle. These days, an Apache2 is > installed on many machines, and it is better to have tests, than to have > no tests, even if they are not exercised everywhere, right? I think a sensible guideline would be: - the core tools are tested by default everywhere; - i18n bits and foreign SCM interface are tested by default, but should allow opting-out; - networking test that needs to open listening ports should be off by default but should allow opting-in.