From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-merge: add option --no-ff Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:53:26 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4phsxy55.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <8c5c35580709170817s467fa7dv375952f872bba0e3@mail.gmail.com> <11900461843997-git-send-email-hjemli@gmail.com> <20070918005013.GA6368@muzzle> <8c5c35580709172312w55613a1bw8cc58b200c526fab@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Eric Wong" , "Junio C Hamano" , "Andreas Ericsson" , "Johannes Schindelin" , "Chris Shoemaker" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Lars Hjemli" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 18 08:53:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IXWxx-0000dA-MS for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:53:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754443AbXIRGxp (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:53:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754432AbXIRGxp (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:53:45 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:50019 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754373AbXIRGxo (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:53:44 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C237135867; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:53:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8c5c35580709172312w55613a1bw8cc58b200c526fab@mail.gmail.com> (Lars Hjemli's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:12:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Lars Hjemli" writes: > On 9/18/07, Eric Wong wrote: >> Would automatically enabling --no-ff when it detects merging of two (or >> more) SVN branches be a good thing? > > I'd say 'git-svn merge' as a wrapper for 'git merge --no-ff' would be cleaner. That unfortunately does not solve the problem.