From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3 Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:13:09 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4picpvgq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vodglr32i.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <46DA5F33.2020005@zytor.com> <85odgltrtj.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <46DA88EF.7080103@zytor.com> <20070902133803.1b46f599.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , David Kastrup , git@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Sean X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 03 00:13:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IRxh4-0001SF-GD for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:13:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754187AbXIBWNR (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:13:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754000AbXIBWNR (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:13:17 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:41956 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752467AbXIBWNQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:13:16 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B009012D3C1; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:13:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20070902133803.1b46f599.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> (seanlkml@sympatico.ca's message of "Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:38:03 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sean writes: > On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:57:03 +0100 > "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > >> From the looks of it, there is still a git-p4, it just moved to contrib >> and uses fast-import, so removing its rpm package was probably broken in >> the first place. > ... > As an aside, when I sent the patch removing git-p4import from the spec > file I mentioned that I had no way to test it and asked for testers. > Git needs a spec file maintainer so that issues like this can be caught > before release. Without a maintainer, it should probably be demoted > to contrib itself. For majority of general public, I thought the spec file _I_ ship, along with RPM files _I_ build, are contrib status already. Don't distro people do their own RPM packages, instead of using what I placed on k.org? Assuming that we do not give the old git-p4import script packaged in "git-p4 package", would the following patch be all that is needed, or do we need other things in the spec file? -- snipsnap clipcrap -- diff --git a/git.spec.in b/git.spec.in index fe7b3d8..3d56e17 100644 --- a/git.spec.in +++ b/git.spec.in @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Source: http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRequires: zlib-devel >= 1.2, openssl-devel, curl-devel, expat-devel %{!?_without_docs:, xmlto, asciidoc > 6.0.3} BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Requires: git-core, git-svn, git-cvs, git-arch, git-email, gitk, git-gui, perl-Git +Obsoletes: git-p4 %description Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an