From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: CVS-$Id:$ replacement in git? Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:45:02 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4pif1r2p.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <46D82DC3.2030203@bioinf.uni-sb.de> <7v8x7r1wyy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andreas Hildebrandt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Aug 31 20:45:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IRBUc-00025V-Cv for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:45:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965914AbXHaSpO (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:45:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965906AbXHaSpO (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:45:14 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:41432 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965847AbXHaSpN (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:45:13 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA2312BC52; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:45:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:12:33 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > ... >> Please do _not_ see that. ident is about blob object name and >> does not have anything to do with the commit, pathname, >> committer, nor date, and this is deliberately so. > > But this is what I was suggesting... To change the ways for the better. The thing is that it is not "for the better". See earlier discussion and please do not beat the dead horse.