From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: tracking perms/ownership Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:35:08 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4pin5rwz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1187716461.5986.71.camel@beauty> <20070821134030.b763e9d3.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <1187817948.5986.159.camel@beauty> <1187905879.5986.199.camel@beauty> <20070824095217.GB16853@coredump.intra.peff.net> <1187970632.6357.108.camel@beauty> <20070824205820.GA19152@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vy7fz659s.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , Josh England , Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Aug 25 21:35:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IP1Pl-00007E-Ij for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:35:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765912AbXHYTfS (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:35:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764229AbXHYTfR (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:35:17 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:44382 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759965AbXHYTfQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:35:16 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8EB1284D4; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:35:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <7vy7fz659s.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:46:39 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > >> Yes, please do. Even if you do not end up implementing the perms/owner >> tracking using the clean/smudge filter, it seems odd that the filter >> should not get the filename. > > Please don't. Go back to the list discussion and recall why any > filters that depends on nothing but contents are bad ("crlf good, > keyword bad"). Don't feed paths to filters. Gaaaaah. I meant "a filter whose action depends on anything other than contents". Those other things include history (so "commit ID" is out) and pathnames.