From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-rebase: suggest to use git-add instead of git-update-index Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:07:20 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4plqqion.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070602175949.GB19952@diku.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonas Fonseca X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 02 21:07:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HuYwp-0003DY-4i for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:07:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758552AbXFBTH2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:07:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758490AbXFBTH2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:07:28 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.241.42]:42707 "EHLO fed1rmmtao104.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756896AbXFBTH1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:07:27 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070602190727.UXS15717.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:07:27 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 6j7L1X0041kojtg0000000; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:07:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070602175949.GB19952@diku.dk> (Jonas Fonseca's message of "Sat, 2 Jun 2007 19:59:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonas Fonseca writes: > The command is part of the main porcelain making git-add more > appropriate. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca > --- > git-rebase.sh | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > I don't know if this is good or not, maybe it is a matter of taste, but > as a new git user I prefer to use git add. I like it. Thanks.