From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Example Cogito Addon - cogito-bundle Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:07:24 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4pu1z3ab.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20061018053647.GA3507@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20061018185225.GU20017@pasky.or.cz> <20061018185907.GV20017@pasky.or.cz> <7vy7rd1m4q.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061018191834.GA18829@spearce.org> <20061018204626.GA19194@spearce.org> <20061018213225.GD19194@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 19 00:07:38 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaJZR-0007AN-Ho for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:07:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423064AbWJRWH0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:07:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751524AbWJRWH0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:07:26 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:43007 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751408AbWJRWH0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:07:26 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061018220725.QYXI12581.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:07:25 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id by7U1V01U1kojtg0000000 Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:07:29 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:55:47 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > I think thin packs have been a good idea, and they certainly cut the > amount of data sent over the network down by a large amount (much more > than 50%), so I think thin packs are a great idea. Just _not_ when > indexed. Ah, I feel quite behind. I was about to say "oh have you been pushing with --thin option?", and then realized that we made it default since late March this year. I need to run memtest86 on myself X-<.