From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] packed deltas with offset to base instead of sha1 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:30:50 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4pv1eqgl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Pearce X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 21 07:30:57 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQH9D-0003EJ-MF for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:30:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751238AbWIUFax (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:30:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751239AbWIUFax (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:30:53 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net ([68.230.241.32]:36295 "EHLO fed1rmmtao07.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751238AbWIUFaw (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:30:52 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060921053051.DSBZ21457.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:30:51 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id QtWd1V0051kojtg0000000 Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:30:37 -0400 To: Nicolas Pitre In-Reply-To: (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:04:14 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nicolas Pitre writes: > The following patches are the result of my work to allow deltas to have > their base specified as an offset within a pack instead of a 20 byte > sha1. > > This turned to be somewhat more involved than I originally expected. > Given the relative pack reduction resulting from that, I might have > decided against doing this if I had known beforehand how much work was > needed. > > But since it is done now I think it is worth merging nevertheless. Some > parts are still pure code cleanups anyway. > > Overall the larger projects are likely to benefit more as they have a > larger proportion of deltas. On the historic Linux archive the pack > reduction is about 5%. Nice, although I suspect this would make it a bit more involved to merge a few outstanding stuff. Will take a look when I'm done looking at Linus's packed-ref stuff.