From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] send-pack: allow skipping delta when sending pack Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 02:14:32 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4pzjzqmf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060521054827.GA18530@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vy7wvx5o9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060521081435.GA4526@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20060521084403.GB12825@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 21 11:14:38 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fhk1E-0004TH-SI for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 11:14:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932331AbWEUJOe (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2006 05:14:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932333AbWEUJOe (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2006 05:14:34 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:37350 "EHLO fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932331AbWEUJOd (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2006 05:14:33 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060521091433.YRYD27919.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sun, 21 May 2006 05:14:33 -0400 To: Jeff King In-Reply-To: <20060521084403.GB12825@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sun, 21 May 2006 04:44:03 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:24:37AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> Hmmm... isn't the patch slightly against git coding style? > > Oops, yes (though the point is moot since the patch is conceptually > wrong). Is there a git coding style document somewhere? When in doubt, please follow the kernel coding style ;-).