From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Cc: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>,
Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: efficient cloning
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:42:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v4q1sgpet.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <441FB715.1000500@op5.se> (Andreas Ericsson's message of "Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:19:33 +0100")
Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> writes:
> That way the only extra dwimery would be to add "remotes" after
> "heads" under .git/refs and accept directory in .git/remotes/ as ref
> and tack on '/master' at the end of it as the last option to
> search. For a specific branch on an imported remote, one would have to
> say "jc/next". This means we still only handle 'master' specially so
> we don't introduce any new protected or special names.
Two things that holding me back from doing what you suggested
are (1) "master" is just a convention and indeed non-negligible
number of kernel.org trees have "test" and "release" instead
without "master"; (2) I'd really really really want to avoid
teaching get_sha1_basic() C-level about .git/remotes/$origin
file, even though that function is more of a UI level than the
rest of the really core C-level routines.
But if I were forced to choose between the above 2, I would
probably pick defaulting to "master".
The reason I would like to avoid .git/remotes/$origin is because
it is designed to be Porcelainish thing. The underlying C-level
git-fetch-pack never sees it; instead the information fed to
C-level is prepared by the upper layer using that file. As far
as I understand, Cogito does not understand it either, except
that it ships with bash completion code that reads from
filenames there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-21 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-19 21:16 efficient cloning James Cloos
2006-03-19 22:31 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-03-19 23:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-20 0:32 ` James Cloos
2006-03-20 1:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-20 8:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-20 15:18 ` Petr Baudis
2006-03-20 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-20 22:41 ` Petr Baudis
2006-03-20 23:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-20 16:30 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2006-03-20 23:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-20 23:21 ` Petr Baudis
2006-03-20 23:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-21 8:19 ` Andreas Ericsson
2006-03-21 8:42 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2006-03-21 9:19 ` Jeff King
2006-03-21 9:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-21 11:29 ` Petr Baudis
2006-03-21 0:26 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2006-03-21 0:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-03-21 8:28 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v4q1sgpet.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de \
--cc=ae@op5.se \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox