From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: merging initial part of a branch? Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:50:44 -0800 Message-ID: <7v4q477vqj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060111230451.GH8618@fieldses.org> <7vek3epbs9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060112005531.GB14599@fieldses.org> <7vmzi2i5eu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060113030837.GD27214@fieldses.org> <7v8xtkhj5l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060113151005.GA29804@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 13 20:51:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExUx4-0002nC-Dk for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:51:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422903AbWAMTu4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:50:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422906AbWAMTuv (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:50:51 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:33481 "EHLO fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422903AbWAMTur (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:50:47 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060113194816.IUQO17437.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:48:16 -0500 To: "J. Bruce Fields" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "J. Bruce Fields" writes: > .... Plain git > actually seems to have pretty usable interfaces at this point, but it's > not always obvious where to find them.... I share that feeling too, especially in the documentation area. Last time we had something very nice going on in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/12917 whose the key article is: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/13360 but the general sentiment was that having another document is making things more confusing and we should try to clarify the main documentation instead. Pasky said aptly: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/13410 I am not much of a documentation person myself, and I do not have much interaction with people new to git, without which it is hard to know which point is harder to grasp and what documentation pages assume certain things are known to an uninitiated when they should not. So I would really appreciate documentaiotn patches to clarify the current mess ;-). > I also have Yet Another Git Tutorial, at > http://www.fieldses.org/~bfields/kernel/git.html. (Corrections and > suggestions welcomed.) The $prefix defaults to $HOME/bin/. Having $bindir on $PATH ought to be enough and exporting GIT_EXEC_PATH is not needd. Other than that I did not see anything obviously wrong, although I suspect you did not intend to say clone with stgit.