From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git binary directory? Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:36:59 -0800 Message-ID: <7v4q6q5ock.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7voe4y5w3v.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200511060312.jA63CUcv010887@inti.inf.utfsm.cl> <20051106050049.GA5910@vrfy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Horst von Brand , Linus Torvalds , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 06 06:38:49 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EYdDN-0001Ur-DZ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:37:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750718AbVKFFhE (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:37:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750726AbVKFFhE (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:37:04 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.241.30]:13055 "EHLO fed1rmmtao09.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750718AbVKFFhB (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:37:01 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051106053701.OWEY9260.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:37:01 -0500 To: Kay Sievers In-Reply-To: <20051106050049.GA5910@vrfy.org> (Kay Sievers's message of "Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:00:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Kay Sievers writes: > Note that "libexec" is not LSB conform - whatever that means, but it > should probably not be used for new projects. It states: "Applications > may use a single subdirectory under /usr/lib." I had an impression that there are still UNIXy systems that are not even Linux; do they follow LSB and drop libexec?