From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)? Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:24:40 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4qaeqrh3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200507271458.43063.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <7vll3rlnqm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200507271458.43063.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <20050728120806.GA2391@pasky.ji.cz> <20050728153506.GL14229@pasky.ji.cz> <20050728161815.GC17952@pasky.ji.cz> <7v1x5ic1pe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050728183904.GA24948@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Josef Weidendorfer , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 29 04:25:23 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyKYY-0008T8-PX for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:25:03 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262256AbVG2CYv (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:24:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262258AbVG2CYv (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:24:51 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:25755 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262256AbVG2CYn (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:24:43 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050729022428.GNGE19494.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:24:28 -0400 To: Petr Baudis User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Petr Baudis writes: > One of the Cogito design bits is that branch name is something local to > the repository. When you are adding a branch, the local name you assign > it is your private thing repository-wise, and doesn't have to have any > correlation to other repositories you might interact width. I do not disagree with that. I think branch name is mostly a local matter. However, I happen to think that two repositories you use send-pack (not clone which uses completely different protocol) to sync one from the other are semantically equivalent ones, except that the destination may be a strict subset. I think of it as "a copy I throw at a public place to show what I have in my private repository I work in", so,...