From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git rebase -i Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:09:22 -0800 Message-ID: <7v63j6oi0d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <43d8ce650902190121v2e18aac1rfaa64a4ce6e799a3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: John Tapsell , Git Mailing List To: Pieter de Bie X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 19 11:11:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1La5rt-0000oy-91 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:10:57 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754270AbZBSKJa (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:09:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753776AbZBSKJ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:09:29 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:57431 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753337AbZBSKJ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:09:29 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA94A2B77D; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:09:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B55F2B77C; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:09:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Pieter de Bie's message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:00:53 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 64455222-FE6D-11DD-9F7D-6F7C8D1D4FD0-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pieter de Bie writes: > On 19 feb 2009, at 09:21, John Tapsell wrote: > >> Would there be any objections to making 'git rebase -i' default to >> HEAD~10 or maybe 16 or 20. Having sensible defaults for commands >> helps a bit with making it easier to use. > > I'd prefer something a bit less arbitrary, like using the tracked head > for a tracking branch. I'd say that might be a very sane default for users or "branch --track" and/or "pull --rebase", both for i-rebase and rebase.