From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Git vc-git.el versus Emacs vc-git.el versus Gits git.el Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:46:14 -0800 Message-ID: <7v63jrbehl.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <18823.47791.359047.560149@hungover.brentg.com> <87ab93yfjx.fsf@wine.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Brent Goodrick , git@vger.kernel.org To: Alexandre Julliard X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 03 18:48:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUPNL-0003EK-Lf for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:47:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753325AbZBCRq0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:46:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753154AbZBCRqZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:46:25 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:56852 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753070AbZBCRqY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:46:24 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5012A5C8; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:46:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86A6C2A5C2; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:46:16 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 915F82E6-F21A-11DD-A232-6F7C8D1D4FD0-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alexandre Julliard writes: >> 2. There is a vc-git.el in the Emacs top-of-trunk sources, and >> another one in the git/contrib/emacs directory in the Git >> sources. Which one should I use? If I should use the one in >> Emacs, then why is there one in the Git source tree? > > The most recent one is the one in the Emacs trunk, so you should use > this if possible. The one in the Git tree is an older version that's no > longer maintained, though it can still be useful if you are running an > old Emacs version. A patch to add contrib/emacs/README to hold this info would be nice.