From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Lightweight tag ? Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:04:30 -0800 Message-ID: <7v63klsgf5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <38b2ab8a0901111044x5db21d74i25ff7a26bb702a5d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Francis Moreau" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 11 22:06:44 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LM7W0-0006Jh-4v for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:06:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752071AbZAKVEk (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:04:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751848AbZAKVEj (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:04:39 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:61345 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751023AbZAKVEj (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:04:39 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4376D1C44C; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:04:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4056B1C42E; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:04:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <38b2ab8a0901111044x5db21d74i25ff7a26bb702a5d@mail.gmail.com> (Francis Moreau's message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:44:30 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 746B1D34-E023-11DD-BB4B-2E3B113D384A-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Francis Moreau" writes: > My problem is that I don't see their point ! > > They behave the same way like the annotated tags: when pushing to a > repo the lightweight tags are pushed as well, and pulling from a repo > with lightweight tags give the same results (all of this with the > --tags switch). Don't use explicit --tags blindly. It says "no matter what kind of tag, transfer everything under refs/tags". Otherwise you won't see a difference.