From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Teach git fetch to verify signed tags automatically Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:43:00 -0800 Message-ID: <7v63m8aamz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1227497000-8684-1-git-send-email-deskinm@umich.edu> <20081128001825.GA29662@euler> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Deskin Miller X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 28 02:44:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L5sPI-0003tP-VD for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 02:44:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753212AbYK1BnQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:43:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753208AbYK1BnQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:43:16 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:42781 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753211AbYK1BnP (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:43:15 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0389882E61; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:43:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD2CA82E5E; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:43:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20081128001825.GA29662@euler> (Deskin Miller's message of "Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:18:25 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EC60A0EC-BCED-11DD-8E54-465CC92D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Deskin Miller writes: > The user didn't ask to verify, as I see it; rather, they asked git to > *try* to verify. If that is your argument, I really do not see any point in your patch. They asked git to fetch, and did not say anything about trying anything else.