From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect wording in git-merge.txt. Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:27:29 -0800 Message-ID: <7v63w3iupq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1204564483-5260-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 03 18:29:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWETm-0008Ui-Ou for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:29:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761947AbYCCR1t (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:27:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761358AbYCCR1s (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:27:48 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:41028 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757826AbYCCR1o (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:27:44 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93041FA1; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:27:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599041FA0; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:27:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1204564483-5260-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> (Matthieu Moy's message of "Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:14:43 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Matthieu Moy writes: > A merge is not necessarily with a remote branch, it can be with any > commit object. Thanks. Sign-off, and perhaps mention other people who helped refine the wording in the discussion?