From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set OLD_ICONV on Cygwin. Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:54:00 -0800 Message-ID: <7v63ze5osn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <21977191.137171196775591804.JavaMail.www@wwinf1621> <4755597B.9050709@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pascal Obry , Pascal Obry , Pascal Obry , git@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 04 18:54:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Izbye-0005Ly-2b for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:54:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751943AbXLDRyO (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:54:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751859AbXLDRyO (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:54:14 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:39695 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751502AbXLDRyN (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:54:13 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E902F2; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:54:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346A89CD6C; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:54:26 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4755597B.9050709@op5.se> (Andreas Ericsson's message of "Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:43:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andreas Ericsson writes: > Nice. If my suspicions are correct and he missed your patch the first time > around, you should probably resend it though. I still have it in my mailbox. I saw the patch but saw nobody else said about the patch being helpful to his installation, nor more importantly, "Good, this won't hurt for me who run a different vintage of Cygwin", and I was waiting for such confirmations. Then nobody responded, so I forgot. That was what happened the first time Pascal's patch was posted.