From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Bisect: factorise "bisect_write_*" functions. Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:13:12 -0700 Message-ID: <7v640x7a4n.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20071014142938.d722299c.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Couder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 24 00:13:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IkS0F-0007eQ-7m for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:13:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754771AbXJWWNW (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:13:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754661AbXJWWNW (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:13:22 -0400 Received: from rune.pobox.com ([208.210.124.79]:46164 "EHLO rune.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754557AbXJWWNV (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:13:21 -0400 Received: from rune (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rune.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBEF14EBC8; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:13:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790D814EAD1; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:13:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20071014142938.d722299c.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (Christian Couder's message of "Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:29:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sort of offtopic, but is "factorise" a correct verb here? I thought "factorise" is to express a non prime number as the product of prime numbers. "refactor" is the act of splitting and merging pieces of functions for better reuse, isn't it?