From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Buffer overflows Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:31:14 -0700 Message-ID: <7v642soai5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1188502009.29782.874.camel@hurina> <3f4fd2640708301435s7067137cp5db6334af844158a@mail.gmail.com> <7vtzqg7jrn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <200709021542.31100.johan@herland.net> <3f4fd2640709020811r4ea8f01fw775257859e26af29@mail.gmail.com> <85veatqelm.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 03 02:31:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IRzr4-0004GV-3V for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:31:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752741AbXICAbS (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:31:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753022AbXICAbS (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:31:18 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:43371 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752327AbXICAbR (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:31:17 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A1612D191; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:31:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jakub Narebski's message of "Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:19:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > ... >> Remember git's history. > > On the other hand instead of doing binary diffs from a scratch, git uses > [customized] LibXDiff library. The same might be done with bstring library, > I think. I am very much in favor of reusing code that aleady proved itself in the field outside git's context.