From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Submodule merge support Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 00:55:08 -0700 Message-ID: <7v646mfw6b.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070520154227.GG5412@admingilde.org> <20070521062005.GK3141@spearce.org> <20070521073253.GU5412@admingilde.org> <20070521073758.GP3141@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Martin Waitz , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 21 09:55:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hq2ja-0003e7-8Z for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 09:55:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754375AbXEUHzK (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 03:55:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754657AbXEUHzK (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 03:55:10 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.241.43]:55064 "EHLO fed1rmmtao103.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754375AbXEUHzJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 03:55:09 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070521075510.ZCNM19731.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Mon, 21 May 2007 03:55:10 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 1jv81X0061kojtg0000000; Mon, 21 May 2007 03:55:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070521073758.GP3141@spearce.org> (Shawn O. Pearce's message of "Mon, 21 May 2007 03:37:58 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > Its a very old Sun C compiler, and it doesn't like structs to be > initialized that way. Yes, newer compilers are better, and gcc is > also better, but I'm unable to get our UNIX admins to actually do > their job and keep systems usable by the users. > > /me starts to wonder why he continues with this day-job thing... Time for a "git company" ;-)?