From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Initial subproject support (RFC?) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:32:38 -0700 Message-ID: <7v6484vxd5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <81b0412b0704100604x2841d96aq194d3dedd303c588@mail.gmail.com> <81b0412b0704100848n69c99f55xa7cc96087cad7e31@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alex Riesen , Git Mailing List To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 11 05:34:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HbM55-0001H6-By for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:32:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753354AbXDJTck (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:32:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753329AbXDJTck (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:32:40 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:45717 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753354AbXDJTcj (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:32:39 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070410193238.JGMK1268.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:32:38 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id lXYe1W00N1kojtg0000000; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:32:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:07:49 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Alex Riesen wrote: >> >> It is already "merged somewhere": as soon as the patches left landed >> on vger, it is not possible to loose (and even destroy) them. >> The feature is just too much sought after. > > Well, unless it hits something like Junios 'pu' (or 'next') branch, or > somebody (like you?) ends up maintaining a repo with this, it's just > unnecessarily hard to have lots of people working together on it.. Well, I was planning to apply this directly on 'master' after giving them another pass.