From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [howto] Kernel hacker's guide to git, updated Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 04:55:04 -0700 Message-ID: <7v64si4von.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <433BC9E9.6050907@pobox.com> <20050929200252.GA31516@redhat.com> <433C4B6D.6030701@pobox.com> <7virwjegb5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <433D1E5D.20303@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linux Kernel , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 30 13:55:20 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELJTz-0006IC-SG for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:55:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751443AbVI3LzI (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:55:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751441AbVI3LzI (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:55:08 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:31899 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751440AbVI3LzG (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:55:06 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20050930115503.SADV4527.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:55:03 -0400 To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <433D1E5D.20303@pobox.com> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:15:41 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff Garzik writes: > ... Once the 'git fetch --tags' changes make it into the > official repository (are they there already?), I'll remove all > the remaining direct references to running rsync. Sounds like a thinly veiled threat and/or very effective prodding ;-). It is not there yet only because I simply have not got around to it, but it will happen before 0.99.8. I suspect the version Linus posted has a funny interaction with 'git-pull'; 'git pull --tags' by mistake, or intentionally to file a bug report to annoy me ;-), would create an Octopus out of those tags, if I am not mistaken. > 2) What is the easiest way to obtain a list of changes present in > repository B, that are not present in repository A? I used to use > git-changes-script [hacked cg-log script] for this: I think I still have the copy you sent to the list. If you do not mind me placing in the master branch just holler -- better yet please send a patch with commit log and signoff to add the latest, and I will apply it. -jc