From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [bug] git cannot find "git pull"? Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:44:28 -0700 Message-ID: <7v7hzidvcj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4A319CE1.6040201@garzik.org> <20090612011737.GB5076@inocybe.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Garzik , Git Mailing List To: Todd Zullinger X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 12 04:45:26 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MEwli-00014A-3K for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:45:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756364AbZFLCoi (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:44:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753461AbZFLCoh (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:44:37 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.241.42]:49114 "EHLO fed1rmmtao104.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752723AbZFLCoh (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:44:37 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090612024439.RBLR17135.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:44:39 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.225.240.211]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 2qkU1c00E4aMwMQ03qkfXV; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:44:39 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=0MMDW3Mb48cA:10 a=F1brEb3fTY8A:10 a=ybZZDoGAAAAA:8 a=Q3xF5HEJDsvBGoBtwOMA:9 a=9tUPXbXGww7tnBATU7HmQ-OuyScA:4 a=qIVjreYYsbEA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 In-Reply-To: <20090612011737.GB5076@inocybe.localdomain> (Todd Zullinger's message of "Thu\, 11 Jun 2009 21\:17\:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Todd Zullinger writes: > It is notable that Fedora 11 is the first Fedora release that follows > the git 1.6.x defaults and installs most git binaries outside of PATH. > I don't think that would cause this, and I haven't had any troubles > running these packages for many months, but that's never stopped > really obvious bugs in the past... I do not follow distro packaged versions of git, but it may help to double check your spec changes against the output of $ git log -p v1.5.6..v1.6.2.2 -- git.spec.in to see which paths need to be updated. Of course, you might not be using a specfile remotely similar to what we have in-tree (I believe it was originally done by Chris Wright who is listed as one of the persons who have something to do with Fedora packaged versions of git in your maintainers list), so this may not be a helpful tip at all, in which case I apologize...