From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] builtin-remote improvments Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:39:53 -0800 Message-ID: <7v7i3fhgye.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1235472816-52420-1-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King To: Jay Soffian X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 24 18:41:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lc1Hf-0006zi-Ld for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:41:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759002AbZBXRkF (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:40:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758798AbZBXRkD (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:40:03 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:34442 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758038AbZBXRkB (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:40:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3152B7AC; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:39:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2FBC2BCE8; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:39:54 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 28978F8E-029A-11DE-A6C0-6F7C8D1D4FD0-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jay Soffian writes: > When I have the series really ready, would you prefer I setup a repo for > you to pull from? I'm loath to spam the list with another 24 messages. I don't mind pulling, as it is less work for me, but it would make harder for others to see the changes in flight and discuss, so... Even though I'd need to re-read them before merging them to 'next', I also think the earlier remote-set-head series and Jeff's changes on top of it looked more or less reasonable. Perhaps I should rebase them on top of 'master' before moving them to 'next' and then you can build on top, which would reduce your new series by about 10 commits.