From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Mark Burton <markb@ordern.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git commit won't add an untracked file given on the command line
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:07:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v7i6zs4ay.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0811191247560.19665@iabervon.org> (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:01:04 -0500 (EST)")
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> writes:
> I don't think that's what Mark wants, in this case. He's looking for the
> ability to have "git commit" act on a temporary index created by adding to
> the parent commit explicitly named files which aren't in the non-temporary
> index.
Ah, I think that it would not be an entirely unreasonable thing to do
(cf. Message-Id: <7vtza4trdp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>).
You can say "git add that/directory" and .gitignore mechanism protects you
from crufts in that/directory, so fearing "git commit that/directory" to
add random junk to the next commit is not a reason to fear it.
But that is a huge behaviour change. For example, I have a handful test
scripts in my t/ directory (all named following the usual t????-*.sh
naming convention) that I do not want to commit. Today, after making
changes to the tracked test scripts, I can rely on "git commit t/" not to
include them in the commit, and I've _learned_ to trust that behaviour.
I'd be surprised if others who have used git for more than a few months
haven't done so as well.
Allowing what Mark wants without any explicit user customization will be a
disaster to the end user experience.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-19 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-18 21:12 Git commit won't add an untracked file given on the command line Mark Burton
2008-11-18 21:27 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-18 21:47 ` Mark Burton
2008-11-19 1:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-19 1:21 ` Miles Bader
2008-11-19 1:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-19 3:43 ` Miles Bader
2008-11-19 9:41 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-20 5:06 ` Miles Bader
2008-11-19 1:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-19 9:54 ` Mark Burton
2008-11-19 11:27 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-19 13:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-19 14:41 ` Mark Burton
2008-11-19 18:01 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-11-19 23:07 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-11-19 23:30 ` Mark Burton
2008-11-19 23:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-19 23:52 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-11-20 0:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-20 10:18 ` David Aguilar
2008-11-18 22:16 ` Matthieu Moy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v7i6zs4ay.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markb@ordern.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox