From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] Support bundles in builtin-clone Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:55:16 -0700 Message-ID: <7v7igbm8cb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Daniel Barkalow , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 10 06:56:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYazb-000780-BD for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:56:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752278AbYCJFzd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:55:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752218AbYCJFzc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:55:32 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:33593 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752137AbYCJFzc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:55:32 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F2829CD; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:55:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC8E29CC; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:55:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:56:54 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Of course, I am okay with it, but I consider the From: issue a real bug in > send-email (or format-patch, if you want). Format-patch is about recording the author of the patch on From: line (think of it a tool to reproduce an e-mail that you would have received and applied to your tree). It may probably make a lot of sense to teach send-email not to forge From: (even though, RFC is Ok with it, as long as it also correctly adds Sender: pointing at the real sender).