From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Reduce the number of connects when fetching Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:34:00 -0800 Message-ID: <7v7ikvkc1z.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v1wb4kuoc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <47302218.3060409@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Daniel Barkalow , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 06 09:34:26 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IpJtB-0005bA-PY for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:34:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753417AbXKFIeL (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 03:34:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752605AbXKFIeK (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 03:34:10 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:54563 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750951AbXKFIeJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 03:34:09 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FF32EF; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 03:34:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2200D9095F; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 03:34:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <47302218.3060409@viscovery.net> (Johannes Sixt's message of "Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:13:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt writes: > The tags that the server provides are those (and only those[*]) that > reference objects in the packfile that it's going to send. > > [*] This way the client doesn't have to figure out which tags it > wants; ... Yes, but that shifts the burden to the sending side which is always bad. We want to make the client work as much as possible when it is practical.