From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: [Bradford C. Smith] [PATCH 2/2] use lockfile.c routines in git_commit_set_multivar() Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:39:26 -0700 Message-ID: <7v7ioocatt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 26 01:39:30 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IDqS2-00053C-Ir for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:39:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751863AbXGYXj2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:39:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752473AbXGYXj2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:39:28 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:43321 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751712AbXGYXj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:39:27 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070725233926.ZQZR1358.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:39:26 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id TzfS1X00K1kojtg0000000; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:39:26 -0400 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: From: "Bradford C. Smith" Subject: [PATCH 2/2] use lockfile.c routines in git_commit_set_multivar() Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:49:53 -0400 Message-Id: <11853821962210-git-send-email-bradford.carl.smith@gmail.com> Changed git_commit_set_multivar() to use the routines provided by lockfile.c to reduce code duplication and ensure consistent behavior. Signed-off-by: "Bradford C. Smith" Dscho, I think this is worth doing regardless of that "symlinked config" issue. I haven't followed the code closely enough, though. What do you think?