From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH (REVISED)] Add core.editor configuration variable Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:20:55 -0700 Message-ID: <7v7iow2ae0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <11848281302504-git-send-email-aroben@apple.com> <200707190848.54655.andyparkins@gmail.com> <95E642DA-F848-4398-9D9D-52B03A235887@silverinsanity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Brian Gernhardt , Andy Parkins , git@vger.kernel.org, Adam Roben To: Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 20 02:21:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IBgF6-0004iF-Ip for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:21:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758028AbXGTAU6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:20:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758014AbXGTAU6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:20:58 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:55345 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757286AbXGTAU5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:20:57 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070720002056.BLCG1399.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:20:56 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id RcLv1X0031kojtg0000000; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:20:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:32:37 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nicolas Pitre writes: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Brian Gernhardt wrote: > >> For many people commit is more "core" to their git usage than write-tree and >> commit-tree. At this point, it's less an extra layer porcelain and more the >> standard interface. It's a result of the wonderful attempts to make git more >> user friendly. >> >> As far as [core] being only for plumbing, I disagree with that premise as >> well. Any option that is used across many of the git commands is a core >> (meaning central) option. > > That pov certainly makes sense to me. Good to see the discussion converged while I was trapped in the day job. So core.editor it is?