From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: basics... when reading docs doesn't help Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:39:56 -0700 Message-ID: <7v7isy1n4z.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070329211616.GH6143@fieldses.org> <7vabxv3fnx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070329214654.GI6143@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , "J. Bruce Fields" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 30 22:40:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HXNtV-0003p8-EJ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:40:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753605AbXC3Uj6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:39:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753607AbXC3Uj6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:39:58 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:36797 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753605AbXC3Uj5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:39:57 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070330203957.WMDI25613.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:39:57 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id h8fw1W0031kojtg0000000; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:39:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:49:20 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Guennadi Liakhovetski writes: >> Yeah, this is all a bit complex, and it takes a while to wrap your head >> around it, but I have to say, once you do, the git-1.5.x layout really >> *is* very powerful, and it's actually very natural too (but the "very >> natural" part only comes after you have that "Aaahh!" moment!) > > Aha, so, that's how it is then! Why hasn't anybody explained this to me > strait away?!:-)))) Because I and others have explained that to other people on the list a few times already, perhaps? The list archive is your friend. > .... There isn't a way to convert such a "old style" tree to the > "new style", is there? That also can be found in the list archive. I think Shawn Pearce wrote that script using contrib/remotes2config.sh from the git.git project source tree.