From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [Census] So who uses git? Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:52:23 -0800 Message-ID: <7v7j8gyy2w.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <46a038f90601251810m1086d353ne8c7147edee4962a@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90601272133o53438987ka6b97c21d0cdf921@mail.gmail.com> <1138446030.9919.112.camel@evo.keithp.com> <7vzmlgt5zt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060130185822.GA24487@hpsvcnb.fc.hp.com> <20060131181248.GE11955@fieldses.org> <7vbqxsyyym.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <1138736666.24410.38.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 31 20:53:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F41YH-0002tJ-97 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:52:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751414AbWAaTw0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:52:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751415AbWAaTw0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:52:26 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:25582 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751414AbWAaTw0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:52:26 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060131194921.CZRQ20050.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:49:21 -0500 To: Jon Loeliger In-Reply-To: <1138736666.24410.38.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> (Jon Loeliger's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:44:27 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jon Loeliger writes: > I have done this style of "update-index on more-or-less OK > files in order to clear up the diff. And it is also in that > time frame that I start feeling that certain changes belong > to "one commit" or another. The result is, I want to then > pick the parts that get committed together. But _really_ > being certain exactly which files, and _only_ those files, > will really be committed is tough. $ git diff --cached would help. If you are _only_ comitting either all changes or no change per path, 'git diff --cached --name-status' would be sufficient.