From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: master has some toys Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:21:13 -0800 Message-ID: <7v7jb83w8m.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20051115144223.GA18111@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <7vr79g8mys.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 17 02:22:54 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EcYSv-0000Qg-Dc for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 02:21:29 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030583AbVKQBVQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:21:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030585AbVKQBVQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:21:16 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:28554 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030583AbVKQBVO (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:21:14 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051117012042.NRRJ6244.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:20:42 -0500 To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <7vr79g8mys.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:30:19 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Incidentally, for the last couple of days, I was working on > adding a very limited binary file diff support to "diff piped to > apply" pattern, and the result has been posted as "reworked > rebase" patches. It is very limited in the sense that the diff > output does not attempt to be useful if the patch consumer does > not have both pre- and post-image blob, but for the use of > StGIT's internal patch replaying purposes that is not a concern, > so you might be interested in taking a look. Along with the git wrapper fixes and git-apply bugfix (it did not fail when it saw unapplicable binary patches), and cvsexportcommit fixes from Kevin Geiss, I have the "limited binary patch support" on the master branch. The reworked rebase is still in proposed updates branch. I'll be offline for a couple of hours chaffering my wife.