git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] transport-helper: update remote helper namespace
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:13:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v8v4l7ils.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAMP44s3+eaRbeXP0bPXMSE8Z1K_Lqyu8e1XCvudkapkTJFBWnA@mail.gmail.com

Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:

> Why wasn't this patch merged to 'pu'? To my knowledge nobody raised
> any real concerns.

There are many reasons not to queue _everything_ ever posted to the
list on 'pu', and they are almost always not a deliberate rejection.

The maintainer may have thought he is not the best person to judge
changes to the area the patch touches, and may be expecting further
comments from others, but haven't said "Comments?" and waiting for
them to say something without being asked. Or the maintainer may
have judged that it is likely to result in wasted work if he queues
that version of the patch, fixing trivial nits himself, only to see
a reroll arrive before the day's integration cycle finishes (which
makes him run the cycle again). Or the maintainer may have been busy
tending to other topics. Or the maintainer may have pushed the patch
down the queue for any of the above reasons to deal with it later,
and after having tended to others' topics, may have forgotten about
that patch.

Do I need to go on?

> I know I said I was going
> to update the commit message, but I don't think that reason to not put
> it in 'pu'.

For this particular case, I think that was exactly the reason why it
is not in 'pu' today. I actually did not remember the reason when
you asked above, until I read the above "I said I'll update".

One major reason why I queue a patch that is clearly not ready for
'next' is because I do not want to forget about the topic and not
because I want to keep the particular version of the patch. I do so
especially when contributor is unlikely to come back soon. If you
said you would come back soon, I do not even have to judge if it is
"clearly not ready" or "it is good enough" for next, and I have to
remember one less thing. The more I can put in "this will come back
so I do not have to do anything" bin, not in the "queue it as-is for
now, because it is likely that it won't be rerolled soon and I'll
forget about it" bin, the easier for me and we as the development
process as a whole can scale better.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-14  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-11  0:07 [PATCH 0/2] transport-helper: general fixes Felipe Contreras
2013-04-11  0:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] transport-helper: improve push messages Felipe Contreras
2013-04-11  3:41   ` Jeff King
2013-04-11  0:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] transport-helper: update remote helper namespace Felipe Contreras
2013-04-11  4:33   ` Jeff King
2013-04-11  4:53     ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-11  5:05       ` Jeff King
2013-04-11  5:18         ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-13  6:00           ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-14  5:13             ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2013-04-14 15:42               ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-14 18:45                 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-14 19:00                   ` Jeff King
2013-04-16  0:56                   ` Jonathan Nieder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7v8v4l7ils.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=srabbelier@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).