From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Git ticket / issue tracking ERA: Git shouldn't allow to push a new branch called HEAD Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:46:54 -0800 Message-ID: <7v8vn8djo1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1321970646.3289.19.camel@mastroc3.mobc3.local> <1321977372.3289.38.camel@mastroc3.mobc3.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Ardill , Git Mailing List , Jeff King To: Daniele Segato X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 22 20:47:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSwJ5-0003cp-Bm for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:47:03 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757117Ab1KVTq6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:46:58 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:44130 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757066Ab1KVTq4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:46:56 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619AE6FA0; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:46:56 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=vXyJxXmxyzXI3CJlFjNqKsjLGAA=; b=ezIcac bmaGh88+0SM0R9MnGQapece+1uLIVgZywK18z2NN5N2Bs6GYLQXFgkixDQ0Z7mS4 2fJopD/GMrG6+u8KyoScva1ZSWvg8hTQb1Ul5NyRXOOpZbldc+MK+PVqK/XSp6NB to6gIrybAlSweJsmgpsk9o/Ve2GlvFjVBg44E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qOdCPpuY5Ag+ALbhi/FN3HEFIE9riU/9 bQImfyrW/605wvVc7Secd4nMCPDaGGnwstO1U28ZP9PNE4WJqj2sqOmTnevQv/E9 gYy/wbLc7IXlsIQjC/h1VLB+yK6ceX9dR4chmuRNyvbvQopXN8j2YH3hqaKdfreW DynC65suZxs= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542A96F9F; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:46:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6C1C6F9E; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:46:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1321977372.3289.38.camel@mastroc3.mobc3.local> (Daniele Segato's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:56:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BBA8E29C-1542-11E1-94A4-9DB42E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Daniele Segato writes: > Let me explain my idea with an example: > > An issue is discussed, a bug is acknowledged and a proposed solution is > discussed, this all happen in the mailing list, like it always has. > > Someone in the "git management" (the one that usually choose how git > should evolve) open a ticket, copy the relevant part of the mailing list > (or link to the discussion in the archive) and (optionally) place the > bug / feature / enhancement into a roadmap / milestone This step I wouldn't buy, if you count me as part of "management". But I suspect that curation of issues, prodding parties involved and closing inactive/stale ones can be done by volunteer project secretaries without requiring an authority to choose how git should evolve. cf. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110117/focus=110129