From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
John 'Warthog9' Hawley <warthog9@eaglescrag.net>,
John 'Warthog9' Hawley <warthog9@kernel.org>,
Uwe Kleine-Koenig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>,
Sebastien Cevey <seb@cine7.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] gitweb: Improve ctags, introduce categories
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:31:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v8vuswxqs.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304099521-27617-1-git-send-email-jnareb@gmail.com> (Jakub Narebski's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:51:55 +0200")
A tangent. It is curious why [PATCH 2/6] alone ended up with an encoded
"Subject" header, like this:
Subject: =?UTF-8?q?=5BPATCH=202/6=5D=20gitweb=3A=20Change=20the=20
way=20=22content=20tags=22=20=28=27ctags=27=29=20are=20handled?=
The message actually has the above as a long single line, as can be seen
at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/172479/raw
Just being curious.
The headers suggest that sending MUA was git-send-email speaking to gmail
SMTP. Did we introduce bugs to send-email recently?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-29 17:51 [PATCH 0/6] gitweb: Improve ctags, introduce categories Jakub Narebski
2011-04-29 17:51 ` [PATCH 1/6 (v2)] gitweb: Restructure projects list generation Jakub Narebski
2011-05-07 18:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-04-29 17:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] gitweb: Change the way "content tags" ('ctags') are handled Jakub Narebski
2011-04-29 17:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] gitweb: Mark matched 'ctag' / contents tag (?by_tag=foo) Jakub Narebski
2011-04-29 17:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] gitweb: Split git_project_list_body in two functions Jakub Narebski
2011-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] gitweb: Modularized git_get_project_description to be more generic Jakub Narebski
2011-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH 6/6] gitweb: Optional grouping of projects by category Jakub Narebski
2011-04-29 21:31 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2011-04-29 23:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] gitweb: Improve ctags, introduce categories Jakub Narebski
2011-04-30 20:36 ` Øyvind A. Holm
2011-05-03 14:02 ` git-send-email and non 7bit clean message (was: [PATCH 0/6] gitweb: Improve ctags, introduce categories) Jakub Narebski
2011-05-04 13:50 ` [PATCH/RFC] git-send-email: Do not encode Subject if not required (was: git-send-email and non 7bit clean message) Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v8vuswxqs.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
--cc=seb@cine7.net \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=warthog9@eaglescrag.net \
--cc=warthog9@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).