From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Reference for git.git release process Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:28:15 -0700 Message-ID: <7v8wmtufn4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <49CA78BF.2020101@fastmail.fm> <7viqlxz9go.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090326022757.GC5835@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vtz5hugc6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090326031521.GA7984@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Raman Gupta , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 26 04:29:56 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LmgHy-00045B-Lt for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:29:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754569AbZCZD2Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:28:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754294AbZCZD2Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:28:24 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:37036 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753968AbZCZD2X (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:28:23 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3A19FA3; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:28:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 502B19FA2; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:28:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20090326031521.GA7984@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:15:21 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 27EE22EA-19B6-11DE-86B4-C5D912508E2D-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:13:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Incidentally, that is why I usually favor the current 'matching' default. >> If I decide to push something to the other repository, the other >> repository remembers my wish, so I do not have to keep track (of course, >> for that to work effectively, you have to _own_ the other side; it does >> not work well for a shared public repository and that is why we had a >> lengthy discussion on push.default). > > So if I understand correctly, you would actually like "push matching, > delete missing" behavior? Hmm, that would be good. That would allow me to start publishing the individual topics with ease. I never thought of that.