From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: 'mail' link on http://repo.or.cz/w/git.git no workee? Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:43:09 -0800 Message-ID: <7v8wpcots2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20090116015439.GF12275@machine.or.cz> <7vmydsovs5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090116022408.GG12275@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Baudis X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 16 03:44:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNehM-0007j0-KI for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:44:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753541AbZAPCnQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:43:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753497AbZAPCnQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:43:16 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:53159 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753007AbZAPCnP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:43:15 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B0390C07; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:43:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5595D90C04; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:43:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20090116022408.GG12275@machine.or.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:24:08 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6C8E44CC-E377-11DD-A9E3-5720C92D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis writes: > I was not actually planning to carry the patch over the next gitweb > update since I got no feedback on it (IIRC) since I implemented it. Heh, now you got it. And I do not think you advertised it since you implemented it, so no feedback does not necessarily mean no interest. FWIW, I think looking for a message that has similar words in the mail archive is a nifty feature to have.