From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc v2] git-sh-setup: Fix scripts whose PWD is a symlink to a work-dir on OS X Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:01:07 -0800 Message-ID: <7v8wps59ss.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1230649824-1893-1-git-send-email-marcel@oak.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, jnareb@gmail.com, ae@op5.se, j.sixt@viscovery.net To: "Marcel M. Cary" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 03 23:02:44 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJEZu-0000Fc-Te for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:02:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759863AbZACWBT (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:01:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759673AbZACWBT (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:01:19 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:51462 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752944AbZACWBS (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:01:18 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D500D8D1B8; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:01:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9EC28D1B7; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:01:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1230649824-1893-1-git-send-email-marcel@oak.homeunix.org> (Marcel M. Cary's message of "Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:10:24 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0A3D2C8C-D9E2-11DD-A936-5720C92D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Marcel M. Cary" writes: > I sent the first rev of this patch to just Brian. It didn't have > either of the unit test changes. He said it fixed all but t2300.3, > where cd_to_toplevel doesn't actually "cd", so I made the same change > to the unit test itself. Can someone with OS X try running the test > suite with v2 of this patch? I don't have OS X readily available. I think I saw a success report on the list. Care to resend it with Sign-off (by you) and Tested-by: tester (on PLATFORM) lines as you see necessary for application? Thanks.