From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add support for a pdf version of the user manual Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:37:40 -0800 Message-ID: <7v8wqny2az.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1228949090-22475-1-git-send-email-vmiklos@frugalware.org> <7vd4fzy3il.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Miklos Vajna" , git@vger.kernel.org To: SLONIK.AZ@gmail.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 11 01:39:22 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LAZa7-0005fN-7i for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:39:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752903AbYLKAht (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:37:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752603AbYLKAhs (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:37:48 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:47709 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751820AbYLKAhs (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:37:48 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2091895F; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:37:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ACC818952; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:37:41 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo Razoumov's message of "Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:20:42 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EE5FC25A-C71B-11DD-95DC-F83E113D384A-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Leo Razoumov" writes: > On 12/10/08, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> "Leo Razoumov" writes: >> >> > BTW, for those of us without dblatex, is it possible to have pdf >> > manual pregenerated the same way html and man pages are pregenerated >> > for official releases in the git repo? >> >> >> Those of us includes myself, so... > > Ouch:-) Does it mean that such a useful patch has a low probability of > being accepted? As an optional "make" target, as long as it works for people with the necessary toolchain, I have no problem with the patch, but I would complain if the usual "make doc" try to run the tool I do not want to run with my regular build. I didn't check.