From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>, Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pack-objects: honor '.keep' files
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:30:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v8wrwidi3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HBFmgmcvgPzZ0xq-fRUt98ZOBXGCvwxHGyEwF9bNcgpDgS-t-D3viw@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil> (Brandon Casey's message of "Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:22:41 -0600")
Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> writes:
> <-a>
> -create a new pack containing all objects required by the repository
> including those accessible through alternates, but excluding objects
> in _local_ packs with .keep
I have a feeling that it is debatable if this "fattening to dissociate
from alternates" is what people want.
> <-a -l>
> -Restrict operation to only local objects. Only has any effect with -a|-A.
> -Like -a, but additionally exclude objects in packs accessible through
> alternates.
Presumably you meant "exclude objects accessible through alternates,
either in packs or in loose form"? If so then I think it is a good thing
to have.
I am not sure if listing the behaviour by combination of flags is a good
way to start thinking about this. Wouldn't it be more productive to list
what kinds of repacking are needed, and then label them with combination
of flags? Otherwise you would miss a potentially useful operation that
cannot be expressed with the current set of flags you have.
I think the useful kinds are only these five:
- scoop loose objects that exist in local repository into a new pack,
without touching existing packs at all; exclude anything available in
any existing pack or in alternate repository (either loose or packed);
- pack everything that is needed by the local ref, except the ones that
are borrowed from alternate repositories (either loose or packed), into
a single new pack. There are two variants of this: eject what is
currently packed but unnecessary into loose format when existing local
packs are replaced with the new pack, or lose them (i.e. -A).
- fatten local repository by packing everything that is needed by the
local ref into a single new pack, including things that are currently
borrowed from alternates. There are two variants of this: eject what
is currently packed but unnecessary into loose format when existing
local packs are replaced with the new pack, or lose them (i.e. -A).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 19:32 getting list of objects for packing Brandon Casey
2008-10-31 20:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-10-31 20:48 ` Brandon Casey
2008-10-31 21:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-31 21:40 ` Brandon Casey
2008-10-31 22:23 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-01 0:00 ` Brandon Casey
2008-11-02 3:35 ` [PATCH] t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file drafnel
2008-11-02 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] packed_git: convert pack_local flag into generic bit mask drafnel
2008-11-03 16:12 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-03 18:24 ` Brandon Casey
2008-11-03 20:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file Brandon Casey
2008-11-03 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] packed_git: convert pack_local flag into a bitfield and add pack_keep Brandon Casey
2008-11-03 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] pack-objects: honor '.keep' files Brandon Casey
2008-11-03 20:49 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-05 22:37 ` Brandon Casey
2008-11-06 23:22 ` Brandon Casey
2008-11-07 0:30 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-11-07 1:17 ` Brandon Casey
2008-11-07 8:12 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-07 19:25 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-10 5:59 ` recognize loose local objects during repack drafnel
2008-11-10 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <1226296798-31522-1-git-send-email-foo@foo.com>
2008-11-10 5:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] t7700: demonstrate mishandling of loose objects in an alternate ODB drafnel
[not found] ` <1226296798-31522-2-git-send-email-foo@foo.com>
2008-11-10 5:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] sha1_file.c: split has_loose_object() into local and non-local counterparts drafnel
[not found] ` <1226296798-31522-3-git-send-email-foo@foo.com>
2008-11-10 5:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] pack-objects: extend --local to mean ignore non-local loose objects too drafnel
2008-11-07 1:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] pack-objects: new option --honor-pack-keep Brandon Casey
2008-11-07 1:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep file Brandon Casey
2008-11-07 1:55 ` [PATCH 3/4] repack: do not fall back to incremental repacking with [-a|-A] Brandon Casey
2008-11-07 1:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] builtin-gc.c: use new pack_keep bitfield to detect .keep file existence Brandon Casey
2008-11-07 8:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep file Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-07 8:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] pack-objects: new option --honor-pack-keep Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-03 22:14 ` [PATCH v3] t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file Brandon Casey
2008-11-04 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-04 19:49 ` Brandon Casey
2008-11-04 19:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-04 20:01 ` Brandon Casey
2008-11-04 20:21 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-04 23:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-12 8:09 ` Jeff King
2008-11-12 17:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-12 19:17 ` Jeff King
2008-11-12 17:30 ` Brandon Casey
2008-11-12 17:59 ` repack and .keep series Brandon Casey
2008-11-12 17:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file Brandon Casey
2008-11-12 17:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] packed_git: convert pack_local flag into a bitfield and add pack_keep Brandon Casey
2008-11-12 17:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] pack-objects: new option --honor-pack-keep Brandon Casey
2008-11-12 17:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep file Brandon Casey
2008-11-12 17:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] repack: do not fall back to incremental repacking with [-a|-A] Brandon Casey
2008-11-12 17:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] builtin-gc.c: use new pack_keep bitfield to detect .keep file existence Brandon Casey
2008-11-13 0:50 ` [PATCH] t7700: test that 'repack -a' packs alternate packed objects Brandon Casey
2008-11-12 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file Junio C Hamano
2008-11-12 18:19 ` Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <1225643477-32319-1-git-send-email-foo@foo.com>
2008-11-02 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] packed_git: add new PACK_KEEP flag and haspackkeep() access macro drafnel
[not found] ` <1225643477-32319-2-git-send-email-foo@foo.com>
2008-11-02 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] pack-objects: honor '.keep' files drafnel
2008-11-03 16:17 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-11-03 10:35 ` [PATCH] t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-03 18:20 ` Brandon Casey
2008-11-03 20:25 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-11-03 22:02 ` Brandon Casey
2008-11-04 19:25 ` Andreas Ericsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v8wrwidi3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ae@op5.se \
--cc=casey@nrlssc.navy.mil \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).