From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Alex Riesen" <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: SLONIK.AZ@gmail.com, "Andreas Ericsson" <ae@op5.se>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-fetch should not strip off ".git" extension
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:35:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v8wshwmgt.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vd4htwp6v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:36:40 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> More importantly, the behaviour is consistent with the way how "git fetch"
> and "git clone" DWIMs the repository name by suffixing .git when the input
> lacks it. And this DWIMmery comes from the expectations that:
>
> (1) people name their repository project.git; and
>
> (2) people like using and seeing short names (iow, "clone
> git://$somewhere/project" is preferred over "clone
> git://$somewhere/project.git");
>
> If a repository whose real location is git://$somewhere/project.git is
> cloned/fetched as git://$somewhere/project by people, recording the merge
> source using the shorter name used by people to fetch from it is more
> consistent. The patch breaks this consistency [*1*].
> ...
> [Footnote]
>
> *1* It would be a different matter if the patch at the same time removed
> the fetch/clone DWIMmery. At least such a patch would be internally self
> consistent.
Actually, after looking at what the involved codepaths do, I am inclined
to change my mind. Somehow I thought the transport.c infrastructure DWIMs
and uses the result of DWIMmery throughout the program (iow, at the point
in the codepath the patch touches, we cannot tell what the user originally
asked for), which is not the case at all. That changes everything.
The current behaviour is Ok if you match your behaviour to the original
expectations, but:
* if you clone from "git://$somewhere/project" originally, your
remote.origin.url will not end with ".git";
* or equivalently, if your remote.origin.url does not end with ".git".
and when you fetch in such a repository with or without the patch, the
results are the same. URL without trailing ".git".
So the change in the behaviour is only when you originally explicitly
asked to clone "git://$somewhere/project.git". With the change, that wish
is preserved. Without the change, ".git" is unconditionally dropped.
The situation is the same if you explicitly ask to fetch from a URL that
ends with ".git" (or "/.git"). With the change, the explicit ".git" is
preserved; without it, it is dropped.
So I now think the patch (if it were massaged into an applicable shape
with proper log message and sign-off) is an improvement.
Alex, thanks for sanity checking ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-21 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-18 11:59 [PATCH] git-fetch should not strip off ".git" extension Leo Razoumov
2008-10-20 10:36 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-10-20 15:08 ` Leo Razoumov
2008-10-20 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-21 10:23 ` Leo Razoumov
2008-10-21 16:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-21 22:06 ` Alex Riesen
2008-10-21 22:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-21 22:43 ` Alex Riesen
2008-10-22 7:55 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-10-21 23:35 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-10-22 11:35 ` Leo Razoumov
2008-10-22 11:50 ` Leo Razoumov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v8wshwmgt.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=SLONIK.AZ@gmail.com \
--cc=ae@op5.se \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).