From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Are more and more patches getting lost lately? Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:00:27 -0700 Message-ID: <7v8wu85lqs.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vd4jk8r78.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080904083343.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <20080904172059.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Nanako Shiraishi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 04 11:02:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KbAik-0007I7-0H for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:01:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752543AbYIDJAf (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:00:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752326AbYIDJAf (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:00:35 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:33729 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751760AbYIDJAe (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:00:34 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F332724F5; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:00:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0EBE724F4; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:00:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080904172059.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> (Nanako Shiraishi's message of "Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:20:59 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EE1E3B68-7A5F-11DD-8715-3113EBD4C077-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nanako Shiraishi writes: > Quoting Junio C Hamano : > >> Nanako Shiraishi writes: >> >>> I noticed that recently there are many patches sent to the list >>> that are left unapplied (and many of them are from you). Many >>> of them look useful or at least promising to become useful. >> >> Geez. Well,... thanks. >> >> Do you have particular ones in the list that you really want to see >> in-tree early, do you want all of them, or what? > > Your "diff --quiet" and Petr's bash completion. I do not recall what the status of "diff --quiet" thing was when the discussion petered off. I'll have to dig it up later. I've queued the bash completion from Pasky. > Also there are many patches that are from *you*. Did you forget to apply > them, are they buggy, or are they in any way bad? > > From: Junio C Hamano > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable git rev-list to parse --quiet > Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:10:19 -0700 > Message-ID: <7vy73zd8ok.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/88994 Be reasonable -- that's more than 5 minutes ago. 'rev-list --check-empty $args' would be equivalent to 'test -z "$(rev-list -1 $args)"'; I am not interested in it myself, and original requestor went away. I have been assuming that it is not worth our time to worry about it if the change is not even necessary by somebody who brought it up originally. > From: Junio C Hamano > Subject: [PATCH/RFC] feeding Maildir to git-am > Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:25:57 -0700 > Message-ID: <7vbpzotfyy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/92963 I wanted to see more positive feedback or better alternatives from people who do deal with Maildir, especially because I do not use Maildir anywhere. Again, the discussion seems to have petered out, so... > From: Junio C Hamano > Subject: Re* [PATCH] git-apply - Add --include=PATH > Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:05:31 -0700 > Message-ID: <7vhc99h644.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/93604 IIRC, the patch was in a good shape but without documentation and tests. I suspect reassembling the pieces from the mailing list archive into an appliable e-mail submission would have been trivial, if somebody cared deeply enough, but nothing came out of it.